STRC h01 Phase 5e Mutant Re-Dock Delivery 2026-04-24
Pocket-stability gate for everything docked into Phase 5a WT snapshots. Re-docks 11 ligands (5 LEGACY_LEADS + 5 V2_HITS + tafamidis-analog) against 20 Phase 5d E1659A mutant MD snapshots. Box centre derived per-snapshot from Cα centroid of K1141 + pocket ring residues (1135, 1137, 1165, 1167, 1175); 18 Å cube; Vina exh=16. Settings identical to Phase 5b for direct comparability.
Launched 2026-04-23 ~19:36, delivered 2026-04-24 ~05:35 (~10 h wall, single-host CPU=8 parallel). Output: models/pharmacochaperone_phase5e_mutant_ensemble_redock.json.
Pocket-stability verdict — WT proxy validated ✅
6/11 ligands have a Phase 5b WT-ensemble comparator (5 LEGACY_LEADS + diflunisal positive control). The fenamic V2_HITS + tafamidis-analog have no Phase 5b WT-redock baseline (they post-date 5b).
| Ligand | WT mean ΔG | MUT mean ΔG | ΔΔG | kd_ratio (mut/WT) | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| naphthalene-2-COOH | −5.47 | −5.44 | +0.03 | 1.06× | no shift |
| indole-3-acetic-acid | −5.14 | −5.04 | +0.11 | 1.19× | no shift |
| nicotinic-acid | — | −3.95 | — | 1.29× | no shift |
| cyclopropane-phenyl-COOH | −5.02 | −4.85 | +0.17 | 1.33× | no shift |
| salicylic-acid | — | −4.27 | — | 1.96× | mutant weaker |
| diflunisal (positive control) | −5.43 | −5.43 | 0.00 | 2.09× | mutant weaker |
- Mean kd_ratio across 6 = 1.49×, max = 2.09× (diflunisal)
- All 6 fall under the +1 kcal/mol ΔΔG threshold from the v3b+5d gate.
- Diflunisal at the boundary (2.09× > 2× heuristic) — pocket geometry mostly preserved but slightly less accommodating to halogenated salicylate body. Within Vina’s pose-noise envelope (typical ±0.3–0.5 kcal/mol → ~2× Kd).
Conclusion: WT-based docking validated as proxy for E1659A. v3b’s 29 YELLOWs do not need wholesale re-docking on the mutant. Phase 5f deferred. WT ensemble is the operating receptor model going forward.
Chemistry verdict on mutant — RED across the board
| Ligand | mean ΔG (kcal/mol) | std | best snap | Kd (µM) | f_PC@10µM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| flufenamic-acid | −6.12 | 0.62 | −7.20 | 32.7 | 0.117 |
| niflumic-acid | −5.98 | 0.38 | −6.83 | 41.1 | 0.098 |
| tafamidis-analog | −5.85 | 0.50 | −7.11 | 51.3 | 0.082 |
| meclofenamic-acid | −5.49 | 0.46 | −6.52 | 94.0 | 0.048 |
| naphthalene-2-COOH | −5.44 | 0.37 | −6.14 | 102.5 | 0.044 |
| diflunisal (positive) | −5.43 | 0.43 | −6.19 | 104.2 | 0.044 |
| indole-3-acetic-acid | −5.04 | 0.26 | −5.49 | 202.4 | 0.024 |
| cyclopropane-phenyl-COOH | −4.85 | 0.42 | −5.92 | 275.1 | 0.018 |
| salicylic-acid | −4.27 | 0.30 | −4.94 | 741.3 | 0.007 |
| nicotinic-acid | −3.95 | 0.31 | −4.63 | 1,276 | 0.004 |
| sulfasalazine | −1.80 | 4.72 | −6.70 | 47,925 | 0.000 |
- 0 GREEN / 0 YELLOW / 11 RED at MILD-MODERATE threshold f_PC ≥ 0.30
- Best mutant lead: flufenamic-acid Kd 32.7 µM (RED, fenamic-tox-blocked per STRC h01 Fenamic Scaffold Tox Audit 2026-04-23 — MD probe only)
- Tafamidis-analog mutant Kd 51 µM, f_PC 0.082 — bioisosteric pivot remains valid path but current single analog is not enough; needs the Phase 4h tafamidis-playbook library to materialize as ordered compounds
- Best snapshot pose at −7.11 (tafamidis-analog) and −7.20 (flufenamic) confirms upper-tail capacity exists; ensemble averaging dilutes due to per-snap pocket variance (std 0.4–0.6)
- Sulfasalazine: std 4.72 + best −6.70 → highly multimodal docking, likely too large for 18 Å box on subset of snapshots; mean unreliable, exclude from interpretation
Comparison with WT Phase 5b ceiling
Phase 5b best non-positive-control was naphthalene-2-COOH f_PC 0.047 on WT ensemble. Phase 5e best is flufenamic 0.117 on mutant ensemble — 2.5× improvement, but still 4.3× below the 0.30 MILD-MODERATE threshold and 6.4× below the v3b WT-ceiling f_PC 0.34 from the 12k library.
Translation: the new fenamic scaffold class beats the old shortlist on the mutant, but parent fenamates max out where v3b YELLOWs already are. The forward path is the same as before — Phase 3c v4 fragment-growing on the 3-amino-benzofuran-2-COOH scaffold.
Decision — next-step
Per the v3b+5d decision tree:
- (1) GREEN non-covalent → N/A (no GREENs)
- (2) GREEN covalent → N/A (no GREENs)
- (3) YELLOW → Phase 3c v4 fragment-grow on best YELLOW cluster (3-amino-benzofuran-2-COOH + polar tail subs + acid bioisosteres) — ACTIVATE
- (4) RED → Phase 3c v5 RFdiffusion de novo — defer until v4 RED
Phase 5f (v3b-29-on-mutant dedicated re-dock) stays deferred — 5e proved WT-ensemble adequate.
Phase 4h tafamidis-playbook library compounds (Tier 1 commercial: tafamidis #5, iododiflunisal 12, benzoxazole-3CN #1, benzoxazole-3OMe #2) become the v4 fragment-grow seed set.
Ranking delta
Tier A held. mech 3 / deliv 4 / misha_fit 4 all held.
- v3b YELLOWs validated against mutant pocket — no re-docking penalty needed; WT ensemble carries.
- Chemistry ceiling on parent fenamate scaffold confirmed RED; tafamidis-style bioisosteric optimization (Phase 4h playbook → Phase 3c v4 fragment-grow) is the operational forward path.
- Pharmacochaperone monotherapy-to-NORMAL still out of reach; adjunct-lever framing per Misha Compound-Het Therapy Stack Model intact.
next_step: “Phase 5e mutant re-dock running (v3b YELLOW pocket-stability gate); then Phase 3c v4 fragment-grow on 3-amino-benzofuran-2-COOH scaffold” → “Phase 3c v4 fragment-grow on 3-amino-benzofuran-2-COOH scaffold (Phase 4h Tier-1 commercial seed set); Phase 5f deferred (5e validated WT ensemble as mutant proxy)”active_runs: cleared (Phase 5e delivered).lit_audit: fixedheld; this is a compute delivery, no literature changes.
Connections
[part-of]h01 hub[see-also]STRC h01 Phase 3c v3b + 5d Delivery 2026-04-24 — v3b chemistry ceiling + 5d MD source[see-also]STRC h01 Phase 5 MD Ensemble Rescoring 2026-04-23 — Phase 5b WT comparator[see-also]STRC h01 Phase 4h Tafamidis Playbook Library 2026-04-23 — v4 fragment-grow seed library[see-also]STRC h01 Fenamic Scaffold Tox Audit 2026-04-23 — fenamate parents are MD probes only[see-also]STRC h01 Parameter Provenance Audit 2026-04-25 — Vina/MM-PBSA gates documented as pipeline-specific- Misha Compound-Het Therapy Stack Model
- STRC Hypothesis Ranking