STRC AF3 Interface Triage Protocol
Use this before any AF3, AF-M, Boltz, docking, peptide-interface, antibody, or binder-screening run that could affect a STRC hypothesis. The goal is to stop one-off confidence scores from becoming evidence without controls.
This protocol is adapted from Sang 2026 AF3-TurboAb and the STRC method notes. It is a starting checklist, not a universal validation claim: antibody-antigen thresholds do not automatically transfer to STRC/TMEM145, WH2-actin, homodimers, or small molecules.
When to use
- New AF3/AF-M/Boltz protein-protein or peptide-interface screen.
- Any screen using
ipTM,pTM,PAE,pLDDT,DockQ, contact counts, or interface RMSD as evidence. - Any candidate-selection step that might move a hypothesis tier or next step.
- Any library-scale design run where preprocessing, MSA reuse, or target-feature caching matters.
Protocol
-
Define the target class. State whether the run is antibody-antigen, protein-protein, peptide-protein, homodimer, glycoprotein, or protein-ligand. If it is not antibody-antigen, do not inherit Sang 2026’s
ipTM >= 0.8threshold as a proof threshold. -
Lock the biological input. Record exact sequence, construct boundaries, isoform, mutation, glycosylation state, oligomeric state, cofactors/ligands, and target species. If a number or biological constant matters, resolve it via
sources/lit/before writing scripts. -
Create controls before running candidates. Include plausible positives when available, known negatives, decoy targets, scrambled/unrelated binders, and cross-pair permutations. A screen without decoys can rank candidates but cannot make a specificity claim.
-
Check leakage and overlap. For benchmark-like claims, remove or label pretraining-overlapping structures/sequences. For antibody or peptide libraries, check sequence similarity to known PDB binders where relevant.
-
Set seed policy up front. Use at least 3 independent seeds by default. High and low confidence cases may be stable; intermediate scores need deeper sampling before interpretation.
-
Record the reusable feature plan. If many candidates share one target, precompute or reuse target-side MSA/template/features where the tool permits it. Log tool version, run date, hardware, seeds, and feature source.
-
Score more than one metric. Capture
ipTM,pTM, interface PAE, local pLDDT, contact counts, interface residue lists, and any reference-based metric such as DockQ/RMSD when ground truth exists. -
Calibrate locally. Interpret confidence by separation from the decoy panel, not by an imported literature threshold. A threshold from antibody-antigen work is a hypothesis for STRC, not evidence.
-
Cluster contacts, not just sequences. Group models by epitope/contact footprint, pose, and hotspot residues. Look for pose convergence and contact-patch stability across seeds.
-
Flag induced-fit risk. If a target domain is flexible, glycosylated, disordered, or known to move, treat epitope identity as more reliable than full-pose RMSD. Require MD or experimental follow-up for conformational claims.
-
Separate enrichment from affinity.
ipTMcan enrich true binders in validated regimes. It is not a Kd predictor unless a local Kd calibration exists for that target class. -
Close with STRC bookkeeping. If the run becomes a phase proof, add
## Ranking delta, prepend the hypothesis log, update hub frontmatter if rank/next step changes, and update STRC Computational Scripts Inventory for new or modified scripts.
Minimum evidence language
Use these phrases to keep claims honest:
- Allowed: “AF3 confidence enriches candidates relative to decoys in this target-specific screen.”
- Allowed: “The model identifies a recurring contact footprint across seeds.”
- Allowed: “The result is a structural triage signal requiring orthogonal validation.”
- Not allowed: “ipTM implies nanomolar binding.”
- Not allowed: “An antibody-antigen
ipTM >= 0.8cutoff proves a STRC peptide/protein interaction.” - Not allowed: “A single AF3 model establishes mechanism.”
Source anchors
- 2026-sang-af3-turboab-antibody-structural-prediction: best current protocol precedent for repertoire-scale AF3 antibody-antigen screening, decoys, repeated seeds, leakage checks, and prospective validation.
- 2026-harvey-afm-nanobody-gpcr: caution that nanobody-screening confidence can be target-class-specific and may not transfer outside its validated domain.
- STRC AF3 Static Pocket Blindness to Loop Dynamics: local STRC warning that static structure confidence cannot answer dynamical mechanism questions.
Connections
[source]2026-sang-af3-turboab-antibody-structural-prediction[see-also]2026-harvey-afm-nanobody-gpcr[see-also]AlphaFold 3 Server[see-also]STRC AF3 Static Pocket Blindness to Loop Dynamics[part-of]STRC Research Methodology[applies]H03 Mini-STRC Single-Vector[applies]H09 Synthetic Peptide Hydrogel[applies]H26 Engineered Homodimer