Ren 2002 — Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea

CORRECTION FLAG: The STRC topic file cites this as “Ren T (2002) Nat Neurosci 5:169.” That citation is incorrect. The verified Ren T 2002 paper is in PNAS 99(26):17101–17106, not Nature Neuroscience. No Ren T 2002 Nat Neurosci paper with those details was found in PubMed. The “Nat Neurosci 5:169” citation may refer to a different paper or may be a phantom citation.

TL;DR. Using scanning laser interferometry in sensitive gerbil cochlea, Ren captured the first instantaneous waveform of BM vibration: 16 kHz tone shows up to 6π phase delay over <1000 µm; wave is spatially restricted (~600 µm detectable), compressively nonlinear, with shorter wavelength than predicted. Confirms traveling wave existence.

Key finding. The BM traveling wave is real, spatially restricted, and nonlinear. This paper is context for the TM displacement estimates — the traveling wave drives TM displacement, so BM mechanics set an upper bound on TM input. However, this paper does NOT provide TM displacement values in nm; it measures BM vibration phase and magnitude.

Numbers that matter

ParameterValueUnitsSource locationConditions
Phase delay over BM length measuredup to 6πradiansAbstract16 kHz tone, <1000 µm gerbil basal turn
Detectable BM response range (low level)~600µmAbstractLow-level 16 kHz tone
Peak BM sensitivity (sensitive cochlea vs postmortem)>30dBFig 3Nonlinear amplification at CF
BM velocitiesfrequency-dependentnm/sFigs 1–410–90 dB SPL, 8–24 kHz
Absolute BM displacement in nmNot directly reportedPhase and magnitude normalized; not in nm

Not useful for TM displacement. This paper establishes that BM traveling wave exists in gerbil basal turn. It does not report TM displacement, does not report apical-turn measurements (apical was less well characterized in 2002), and does not address the 5–30 nm range for TM at 60 dB SPL.

Limitations

  • Gerbil basal turn only; mouse apical data (where h02 is most relevant) not in this study.
  • Normalized phase/magnitude; no absolute displacement in nm without cross-referencing stapes/ossicular input.
  • 2002 technology; more recent OCT measurements (Gao 2014, Ren lab subsequent work) provide better spatial resolution.

Connections